What happened to Feminism?

Pimps n Hoes, some would say they don’t approve of the theme and impose a boycott. Is there an ethical justification for lucrative prostitution? Though it is visibly apparent and biologically affirmed that the overall male physical strength is significantly superior to the female one, it seems that its significance is such that it has made the rampant male sexual thirst an act executable by force upon the female body. That act, commonly known as rape has historically been condemned yet clandestinely practiced widely by its very condemners. Even today we are not lacking in examples, we all know why religion has always been so implanted in education. Let us not forget that cases of child sexual molestation by use of force on boys and girls alike has most recently been practiced largely by priests.

Amongst the consequences of the superiority of male physical strength we also have the female dependence upon male protection in the domain of prostitution. In order for females to offer the sexual disposal of their body’s in exchange for money are forced to seek the protection to prevent or mostly to avenge physical abuses and rip-offs. Hence the sadly inevitable concept of Pimps n’ Hoes. The size of the commission pocketed by the pimp can unfortunately be made the entire sum that the “hoe” earns by use of the unjustly advantageous physical superiority of men. However this is greatly facilitated by the fact that prostitution is so widely condemned (mainly religiously) that it is commonly outlawed. This brings prostitution into the darkness of the black market. The drug and sex trades are the most dangerous to indulge in, not just due to police repression but also due to their disproportionate economic value which cause the defence of their practice from cops to competition to be of a very high level of violence.

Sex, drugs, money, and guns are due to prohibition tightly associated.

I say fuck that shit! Legalisation allows regulation, physical and legal security but more importantly for trade unionism. Dutch whores are fully unionised which means their labour rights are recognised and they get a full deserved salary of which they only pay a small portion to the state in the form of taxes: The state being their “pimp”.

In my view that is a wiser option to black market prostitution which in most cases lets male domination prevails. We can see that the male dominated prohibitionist state often claims a sexually equalitarian title but clearly lets male physical force take the lead and turns a blind eye on its use.

However the male attitude to female rights can only really change if there is a conscience of sexual inequality that is fervently opposed by all women. As in the class struggle; class conscience must be acquired by the working classes through education and action taken against the upper classes by the oppressed. A pacifist approach to the class struggle does not imply the murder of the entire upper class so much as to promote and realise an equal redistribution of the wealth and power to more autonomous groups within the working class. That pacifist approach applied to the feminist struggle would be to opt against getting rid of the problem of male physical oppression by killing all men and establishing a purely and orthodox “feminist society”. Unfortunately the term “feminism” seems to have become tainted with that radical violent approach just as Stalin tainted the class struggle with a fiercely authoritarian and repressive reputation.

“Whenever you ask girls whether they consider themselves feminists or not, most of them deny any association with the aforementioned term”. Has the system or the sexist male elements within it really managed to make the defense of their own rights a derogative term even to women? Have women come to accept male domination or do they find a sexual attraction to it? It certainly surprised one or two parents that the theme for a girl’s party be “pimps n’ hoes”, some to the extent of forcing a boycott of it on their kids. Surely that is an exaggerated approach because a party’s all about joking around and having a good time to ignore the politics of it for one night and enjoy satirising the concept.

But my question remains largely unanswered; what did happen to feminism anyway? Why accept the denial of pursuing studies to girls in increasingly Islamic governed countries? Why accept male sex appeal as a marketing tool in selling the female body in publicity? Why listen and dance to Snoop Dogg’s music when he appears in one of his video clips holding women by a leash attached to a dog collar around their neck!?

WHY IS THIS ARTICLE WRITTEN BY A MAN IN THE FIRST PLACE!?!

By BRWG